Final answer:
Smith and Jones' preferences and endowments lead to an inefficient initial allocation, but efficient trade can be achieved along the contract curve where Smith has equal slices of ham and cheese, and Jones has the remainder.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the scenario described, we're asked to imagine an Edgeworth box in which Smith and Jones are stranded on a desert island with slices of ham and cheese. Smith's utility function US = min(H, C) indicates a lexicographic preference, desiring ham and cheese in a 1:1 ratio. Meanwhile, Jones views these goods as perfect substitutes with a utility function of UJ = H + C, indicating a willingness to exchange them one-for-one.
Initially, Smith has 60 slices of ham and 80 slices of cheese, while Jones has 40 slices of ham and 120 slices of cheese. To create an Edgeworth box, draw a rectangle where the width represents the total amount of ham (100 slices) and the height represents the total amount of cheese (200 slices). The initial endowment point is found at the coordinate (60,80) for Smith and (40,120) for Jones when plotted from each individual's origin.
The initial allocation is inefficient because Smith would be willing to give up some cheese for ham until she has equal amounts of both, while Jones would be indifferent to such a trade as long as the total quantity of goods remains the same. Efficient allocations would be where Smith has equal slices of ham and cheese, and Jones has the remaining quantities since Smith would reach her optimal utility and Jones would be indifferent to the specific combination. These points would lie along the contract curve, which, in this example, is where Smith's slices of ham and cheese are equal.