Question

There are three broad classifications of illegal agreements: (1) agreements that are contrary to common law, (2) agreements declared illegal by statute, and (3) ________.

A. agreements made in a foreign country

B. agreements reviewed by a Native American court or tribunal

C. agreements between two corporations

D. agreements that courts have found to be against the security of the general public

Answer 1

C

Step-by-step explanation:

cuz it is according to my calclations and braino

Answer 2

The third broad classification of illegal agreements, beyond common law and statutory contraventions, is agreements that courts have found to be against the security of the general public. These may include any agreements that harm public interests, such as collusive activities that limit competition.

Step-by-step explanation:

The third broad classification of illegal agreements, completing the list that includes (1) agreements that are contrary to common law and (2) agreements declared illegal by statute, is (D) agreements that courts have found to be against the security of the general public. These are agreements deemed to harm the welfare or security of the general public, which the courts have a responsibility to protect. For example, agreements that impede justice, harm public health, or threaten national security could fall under this category.

Contrasting this with legitimate international or intercorporate agreements, illegal agreements often fail to adhere to proper legal standards or may contravene public policy. In cases of collusion, such as cartels, the illegality primarily arises from their anti-competitive nature, which goes against the interest of freemarket competition and can harm consumers and other businesses.