Final answer:
Evaluating alternative means of government finance according to a single criterion is difficult due to the complex nature of taxes and their impact on economic and social variables. Flat-rate taxes and progressive rate structures have different implications, and the choice between them depends on societal goals and values.
Step-by-step explanation:
Evaluating alternative means of government finance according to a single criterion is difficult due to the complex nature of taxes and their impact on different variables. Government finance is a multifaceted issue that involves both economic and social considerations.
When evaluating means of financing government goods and services, important economic variables like tax revenues, economic growth, and efficiency, as well as social variables like income inequality and the distribution of resources, are likely to be affected.
Flat-rate taxes and taxes with progressive rate structures have different implications. Flat-rate taxes, where everyone pays the same tax rate regardless of income, may be seen as inherently more desirable by some due to their simplicity and perceived fairness.
However, progressive rate structures, where tax rates increase with income, can be seen as more equitable because they place a larger burden on those with higher incomes. Both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages, and the choice between them depends on the societal goals and values of a country.