Final answer:
As a monopolist, NovoFarm should set a price where marginal revenue equals marginal cost to maximize profit. If the FDA sets price ceilings, it affects the quantity produced and consumer surplus. The FDA's goal should be to maximize economic surplus, which might involve setting a price ceiling that considers both consumer and producer surpluses.
Step-by-step explanation:
Monopolist Pricing and Production Decisions
The pharmaceutical firm NovoFarm is considering whether to renew the patent for its weight management drug Ozemgovy, given certain market conditions and regulatory actions by the Federal Drug Administration in the Federated Republic of Brobdingnag. The marginal cost of producing Ozemgovy is $2 per dose.
Monopolist Decision
As a monopolist with a patent, NovoFarm would set the price where marginal revenue equals marginal cost to maximize profits. To determine this price, we would calculate the marginal revenue from the demand equation, set it equal to the marginal cost, solve for the quantity, and plug it back into the demand equation to find the monopolistic price.
Impact of a Price Ceiling
If a price ceiling of $25 is set, the quantity produced would be found by plugging the price into the demand equation. The consumer surplus would increase as the price is lower than the monopoly price. For a price ceiling of $5, NovoFarm must consider if the reduced revenue would cover the fixed cost of the patent renewal plus variable costs.
FDA's Maximization of Economic Surplus
The FDA's intention to maximize total economic surplus may involve setting a price ceiling to balance consumer access with maintaining producer incentive to supply the drug. The exact price would depend on the evaluation of combined consumer and producer surplus at different price levels.