Final answer:
Global sorting aims for an egalitarian approach and doesn't prioritize individual assessments, suggesting that jobs have varying levels of prestige. Traditional models of global stratification use economic and industrial factors for classification while highlighting that many factors, including poverty and environment, influence intelligence.
Step-by-step explanation:
The query is related to the concept of global sorting and how it addresses individual assessment. Global sorting does not seem to prioritize individual assessments but aims to treat individuals equally regardless of their abilities, skills, or knowledge. This approach may overlook the specific achievements and potential of individuals.
In terms of occupational prestige, it is recognized that jobs are not equally valued; this implies a form of social stratification where some professions are considered more prestigious than others. As for global stratification, traditional models often classify countries based on industrialization and economic production. Education standards and equitable distribution of resources are also key to a country's performance on global scales.
Regarding the impact of poverty and environment on a person's intellectual development, it is understood that there are many factors, including social and economic conditions, that work together to influence an individual's level of intelligence. This underscores the complex nature of global stratification where various elements contribute to a person's or a country's standing in the world hierarchy.