Final answer:
In the static patent race model with two firms, solving for optimal R&D investment by setting up a profit maximization problem and invoking symmetry does not yield a positive effort level when costs are fixed and benefits depend only on relative effort due to the structure of the problem.
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve for the optimal level of R&D investment (x*) in the static patent race model where R&D expenditure directly influences the probability of winning the patent race, we begin by establishing the profit maximization problem for a generic firm. Given that the victory benefits are π=10 and the cost is c=5, the expected profit for firm i can be defined as:
πi = (probability of success) * (benefits) - (cost) * (effort) = (xi/Σnxn) * 10 - 5*xi
With 2 firms in the race (n=2), when we invoke symmetry (x1=x2=x*), the calculation simplifies because the denominator in the probability equation becomes 2x*. Hence, the expected profit for either firm would become:
πi = (x*/(2x*)) * 10 - 5*x* = (1/2)*10 - 5x* = 5 - 5x*
Maximizing this expected profit involves taking the derivative with respect to x* and setting it to zero:
dπi/dx* = 0 - 5 = -5
However, this derivative does not yield a maximum since it suggests a negative slope throughout. Therefore, the symmetrical effort level that maximizes expected profits for the firms would be x* = 0, which contradicts the requirement that each firm chooses x > 0. In this scenario, our base assumption or model may need reevaluation since in a setup with a fixed positive cost and benefits dependent only on relative effort, firms might lean towards minimal R&D effort due to the cost structure.
This demonstrates the intricacies of R&D investment decisions within a patent race, where spillover benefits and competitive dynamics play a significant role in determining corporate strategy.