71.4k views
5 votes
Translate each argument into symbolic form. Then determine whether the argument is valid or invalid. You may use a truth table or, if applicable, compare the argument's symbolic form to a standard valid or invalid form. (You can ignore differences in past, present, and future tense.) If Dave and Cheryl go home, then I will go home. Dave will not go home or Cheryl will not go home

I will go not home

User Denney
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

The argument is invalid as there is a combination where all the premises are true and the conclusion is false.

Step-by-step explanation:

The argument can be translated into symbolic form as:

(Dave and Cheryl) → (I go home)

¬Dave or ¬Cheryl

¬(I go home)

This is a disjunctive syllogism.

To determine whether the argument is valid or invalid, we can use a truth table:

DaveCherylI go home

TTF

FTT

TFT

FFT

From the truth table, we can see that there is a combination where all the premises are true and the conclusion is false. Therefore, the argument is invalid.

User Radu Gasler
by
8.3k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories