Final answer:
Patients should have access to their EHRs, but with limitations such as restricted access to sensitive data that could cause distress or be misinterpreted, like raw diagnostic data and psychiatric records, to protect their wellbeing.
Step-by-step explanation:
While it is important for patients to have access to their Electronic Health Records (EHRs), certain limitations may be necessary in the best interests of patients. These may include restricting access to sensitive information that could cause unnecessary distress or misunderstanding without proper medical explanation. For instance, raw diagnostic data or clinician notes could be misinterpreted, leading to patient anxiety. Another potential limitation could be in the case of psychiatric records, where unrestricted access could impact the therapeutic relationship or patient wellbeing. It may also be beneficial to limit access to information that is not finalized or verified, to prevent the spread of misinformation. Overall, the goal is to ensure that EHR access supports patient autonomy and engagement without compromising care.