72.4k views
1 vote
"Won’t we miss important information if most of our data are

from secondary sources, and our primary data come only from a
windshield tour?" asks the head of the agency.
"You're right," you say, "we

User JP Emvia
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

Relying solely on secondary sources and a windshield tour may lead to missing important information. Combining primary and secondary data collection methods is crucial for a comprehensive understanding. Triangulating information from multiple sources minimizes the risk of missing data.

Step-by-step explanation:

When relying heavily on secondary sources for data and only conducting a windshield tour for primary data, there is a risk of missing important information. Secondary sources provide information that has already been interpreted and may not capture all relevant details. Primary data collection methods like a windshield tour can provide firsthand observations but may be limited in terms of the breadth and depth of information gathered.



A windshield tour refers to a method of collecting data by driving through an area and making observations from the car window. While this approach can offer valuable insights, it is based on limited interactions and may not capture all the intricacies of a place or situation. By relying solely on secondary sources and a windshield tour, there is a higher chance of missing out on important information that could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the topic.



It is important to combine various data collection methods, including both primary and secondary sources, to obtain a more complete picture. Primary data collection techniques such as interviews, surveys, or fieldwork can provide firsthand information that fills in the gaps left by secondary sources. By triangulating information from multiple sources, researchers can minimize the risk of missing important data and ensure a more robust analysis.

User Coocood
by
7.7k points