Final answer:
As chairman, you should intervene politely and guide the discussion back to the motion to rescind under consideration if a member starts debating the merits of the original motion instead.
Step-by-step explanation:
If you are the chairman and the motion to rescind is immediately pending, and a member debates the motion by discussing the merits of the motion that is proposed to be rescinded, the appropriate action is to ensure that the debate remains relevant to the current motion on the floor.
The debate should be focused on whether the original motion should be rescinded, not on the merits of the original motion itself. If necessary, you may need to intervene politely and remind the member to direct their comments to the motion to rescind that is currently under consideration.
As chairman, maintaining the order and focus of the debate is part of your role. It is also your responsibility to guide the discussion so that members' arguments stay relevant to the decision at hand, which in this case is the motion to rescind.
You should avoid being confrontational and instead, gently steer the conversation back to the issue immediately pending for the benefit of all attendees.
If a member in a chairman role has a motion to rescind pending and a member begins debating the motion, it is the chairman's responsibility to redirect the debate back to the motion to rescind.
The chairman should remind the member to focus on the merits of the motion to rescind rather than the merits of the motion being proposed to be rescinded. This ensures that the discussion remains relevant to the pending motion and allows for a clear and organized debate.