Final answer:
Both an objection to the consideration of a question and a point of order are parliamentary tools used to address issues with the conduct of business in a legislative body, maintaining procedural integrity. An objection seeks to prevent debate on a motion considered inappropriate, while a point of order corrects deviations from the rules.
Step-by-step explanation:
An objection to the consideration of a question and a point of order are both parliamentary procedures used to ensure the proper conduct of business in a formal meeting or legislative body. They are similar in that both are tools used by members to address issues regarding the rules or to correct procedural errors during the consideration of business.
An objection to the consideration of a question is generally a motion that seeks to prevent a particular question or motion from being considered at all. This could be for a variety of reasons, such as the subject matter being inappropriate or irrelevant. Meanwhile, a point of order is raised to address any instance where the rules of the body are not being followed, which can occur at any point during a discussion or deliberation. This is aimed at correcting the process rather than debating the substance of a proposal.
Both procedures are critical to maintaining orderly conduct and ensuring that the debates and decisions made in a legislative body are carried out according to established rules and guidelines.