Final answer:
Typically, an objection to the consideration of a question is not in order when another member has the floor, according to standard parliamentary procedure. However, interruptions may be permitted under specific urgent circumstances or rules of the legislative body.
Step-by-step explanation:
Is an objection to the consideration of a question in order when another member has the floor? Generally, in parliamentary procedures, when one member is speaking, they have "the floor," and it is not appropriate for another member to interrupt with an objection to the consideration of a question. This practice ensures order and respect for members speaking. There are exceptions; for instance, in certain situations, if a motion is critical and impacts the immediate proceedings, a member may raise a point of order or another motion like a motion to table that requires immediate attention. However, for an objection to the consideration of a question specifically, it typically needs to wait until the current speaker has finished and no longer occupies the floor.
Legislative bodies like the United States Senate allow for unlimited debate, subject to certain rules such as cloture. Debates on a bill or a topic continue unless cloture is invoked, which is a mechanism that requires a certain number of votes to end debate and prevent tactics like a filibuster. Therefore, if a member has the floor, they are generally entitled to speak without interruption, and an objection to consideration would be out of order until they have concluded.