Question

Since longer exposures to disinfectants result in better disinfection, why don't we just disinfect everything we need to for a minimum of 5 days?

A. This is impractical financially.
B. Long exposures could begin to adversely affect delicate objects.
C. This may increase the probability of someone being exposed to the harsh disinfectants.
D. All available answers are correct.

Answer 1

Longer exposures to disinfectants can lead to financial impracticality, damage to delicate objects, and increased health risks due to potential human exposure to harsh chemicals. Answer D, which states that all available answers are correct, is the accurate response. Therefore, the correct answer to the question is D. All available answers are correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question relates to the impracticality of disinfecting objects for an extended time, such as 5 days. While it is true that longer exposures to disinfectants result in better disinfection, this practice is not always feasible due to several reasons:

• Financial impracticality: Continuous disinfecting procedures stretched over days would lead to significant financial burdens.
• Damage to delicate objects: Long exposure to harsh disinfectants could degrade the quality of delicate items, affecting their functionality and integrity.
• Increased exposure to harsh disinfectants: Extended disinfection periods could increase the probability of human exposure to these chemicals, with potential health risks.

Therefore, the correct answer to the question is D. All available answers are correct.