Final answer:
To set aside the orders of the day, a supermajority or a specific type of vote is usually required, and when there is no clear majority, the status quo is maintained. Voting complexities can sometimes lead to no definitive outcome, and tensions between majority rule and political power can affect decision-making processes.
Step-by-step explanation:
Understanding Majority Rule in Decision Making
To set aside the orders of the day, a particular type of vote is typically required. This can vary depending on the rules of the organization, but often it involves a supermajority or a more stringent requirement than a simple majority. When a vote is split 50-50 or when the necessary supermajority is not achieved, typically the status quo prevails, and the orders of the day remain in place.
In some cases, it can be difficult to define what constitutes a majority opinion. For instance, when three families with different preferences vote on a shared activity or decision, such as choosing a menu for a celebration, they might all vote for different options leading to no clear majority. A similar issue can arise in political votes or in decisions made by any group where consensus is required but not achieved.
When rules are eschewed or conflicts emerge that cannot be resolved by voting, the outcome can pivot on the use of force or other means outside of the established voting mechanism. Historical examples, such as controversial Supreme Court decisions, can illustrate the tension between majority rule and the realities of political power dynamics.