Final answer:
A positive correlation does not necessarily mean health benefits; proper interpretation within the community context is essential, according to Goodman's approach to evaluating community-based prevention and health promotion programs.
Step-by-step explanation:
According to Robert Goodman's “Principles and Tools for Evaluating Community-Based Prevention and Health Promotion Programs”, the accurate statement regarding social indicators is that a true positive correlation does not necessarily imply health benefits to the variable under investigation. Instead, social indicators can provide important data for evaluating community-based programs, but they must be interpreted in the context of a comprehensive understanding of the community and the specific conditions addressed by the prevention programs. Goodman's work emphasizes the importance of program evaluation as a critical part of community psychology and the practice of evaluating community-based programs.