Final answer:
The inquiry suggests that a rich man should 'glory,' or take pride, not in his wealth but in the ability to benefit others and act humbly, which can be prompted by a humbling experience that rebalances his focus towards societal responsibility.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question, 'Why should the rich man glory when he is made low?' touches on the moral and philosophical considerations of wealth and humility. This reflective inquiry suggests that wealth is not merely a measure of financial prosperity, but also a responsibility. The rich man has the opportunity and resources to create beneficial impact for the greater community. When a rich man is 'made low,' it represents a humbling experience that can refocus his perspective from self-glorification to the greater good, fulfilling his duty to society. This philosophical stance implores the rich to live modestly and use their means to uplift others, following a moral imperative that insists upon the dignification of life through acts of charity and modesty.
Moreover, the notion implies that the value of a person should not be assessed by their wealth, but by their contributions and character—echoing broader themes found in historical texts and advocacies related to wealth distribution and social responsibility. Hence, 'glory' for the rich man comes not from material abundance, but from the recognition of the transience of wealth and the enduring value of moral actions.