Final answer:
Justus's behavior could suggest traits of an antisocial personality, contrasting Jeffrey's Type A behavior pattern. The complexities of societal reintegration and value systems are also pondered with regard to offender behaviors and educational failures. Lastly, psychological concepts are introduced to explain how personal biases can affect perception and judgment.
Step-by-step explanation:
The description of Justus lacking guilt for his actions, empathy for others, and concern for his performance could be indicative of antisocial personality traits. These characteristics may suggest a disorder that is taken seriously in both psychological and legal contexts, as it can affect a person's interactions and integration with society. In contrast, the example of Jeffrey represents a person with a Type A behavior pattern, characterized by intense drive, competitiveness, and a constant sense of urgency. Such individuals are often at higher risk for stress-related illnesses, like heart attacks, due to their inability to relax and their propensity for frustration.
The motivations for an offender's actions after prison, as mentioned in options c and d, relate to social bonds and economic status. These points raise issues surrounding societal integration and community values. Consequences of the educational system failure mentioned earlier, such as getting bad grades, dropping out, and unemployment, also tie into larger societal concerns. Writing that fails to connect with its audience, as described, indicates a lack of thoughtful engagement with the subject matter.
When considering the possible influences on behavior, psychological concepts such as actor-observer bias, fundamental attribution error, self-serving bias, and the just-world hypothesis offer explanations for why people interpret their own and others' actions in particular ways. These biases and beliefs can heavily influence one's perception and judgment of behavior.