69.1k views
1 vote
A focused low-cost strategy seeks to achieve competitive advantage by:

A. outmatching competitors in offering niche members an absolute rock-bottom price.
B. delivering more value for the lesser money than other competitors.
C. performing the primary value chain activities at a lower cost per unit than can the industry's low-cost leaders.
D. dominating more market niches in the industry via a lower cost and a lower price than any other rival.
E. serving buyers in a narrow piece of the total market (target market niche) at a lower cost and lower price than rivals.

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

A focused low-cost strategy involves providing more value for less money by concentrating on a narrow market segment and reducing costs. This approach relies on specializing in a limited range of products or services and efficiently managing production to offer competitive pricing.

Step-by-step explanation:

A focused low-cost strategy seeks to achieve competitive advantage by delivering more value for the lesser money than other competitors, which aligns closely with option B. This strategy often involves a business concentrating on their core competency by specializing in a limited range of products or services. Companies adopting this approach aim for cost reduction and efficiency in production, thereby offering lower prices to consumers without compromising value.

The goal is to cater to a specific segment of the market, known as a target market niche, by meeting their expectations at a cost and price point more attractive than that of competitors. A focused low-cost strategy can lead to significant competitive advantages, especially in industries where there are well-established companies with strong brand names or markets where economies of scale are minimal compared to overall market demand.

In essence, this strategy is about cutting excess costs and focusing the company's resources on a specific, narrow part of the market to provide a combination of lower price and targeted value that rivals cannot match, ultimately concluded in option E.

User TheBrockEllis
by
8.3k points