Final answer:
A primary source provides original research or evidence, like Dr. Drake's study, while a secondary source synthesizes previous research, such as Dr. Pepper's article. Dr. Horton's and Dr. DeBellard's statements are neither, as they lack peer-reviewed support.
Step-by-step explanation:
For each of the following, select the term that best describes the type of literature it represents: primary, secondary, or neither:
- A research study from Dr. Drake and colleagues on the blood sugar levels of diabetic rats that eat only kale, compared to control diets, is published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal is a primary source because it presents original research findings.
- Dr. Horton's statement in an infomercial promoting his health care products would be considered neither a primary nor secondary source; it's rather a personal testimonial with no peer-reviewed evidence to support it.
- Dr. DeBellard's promotion of her personal parasitic tapeworm for weight loss in her blog is also neither a primary nor secondary source; it is an advertisement with anecdotal claims.
- An article published in the Annual Review of Nutrition, where Dr. Pepper summarizes the last 10 years of basic research on diet and diabetes, is a secondary source as it analyzes and synthesizes existing research.