Final answer:
Achieving global acceptance of a plan is difficult due to differences in national interests and sovereignty concerns, making it impossible at the national level. Potential remedies involve international cooperation and consensus-building, yet the notion of a global government is unrealistic in the current geopolitical climate. Instead, multinational treaties and international organizations aim to facilitate cooperation on global issues.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question centers on the challenges of achieving global acceptance of a plan, presumably one related to governance or policy, and whether the institution of a global government would be necessary to enforce such a plan. Achieving global acceptance of any plan is hampered by the diversity of national interests, cultural differences, and sovereignty concerns. Therefore, it is not possible at the national level because no single nation has the authority to implement and enforce policies globally.
To address this, we would need unprecedented levels of cooperation and consensus-building among nations. This could involve international treaties, alliances, and potentially new global institutions that resonate with multiple stakeholders. However, establishing a global government is fraught with complexity, as it would require nations to cede a significant degree of sovereignty, which is highly unlikely given the current international landscape.
In practice, global governance often takes the form of multinational agreements and the work of international organizations rather than a centralized authority. For example, the United Nations and various other international agencies work towards global cooperation on a range of issues. Effective solutions often rely on diplomacy, negotiation, and sometimes economic incentives or sanctions to encourage compliance with international norms and agreements.