Final answer:
The Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) model lacks systems for long-term evaluations and planning. Self and peer ratings in CRM are unreliable, but can lead to learning and discussions with supervisors.
Step-by-step explanation:
The problem with the Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) model is that it does not have the appropriate systems in place to conduct long-term follow-up evaluations. This makes it difficult to conduct long-term need and asset assessments to plan for long-term programming and impact.
In addition, studies have shown that self and peer ratings in the CRM model are unreliable as an assessment of an employee's performance. Even supervisors tend to underrate employees who give themselves modest feedback ratings. However, some argue that this variability in ratings can be a positive aspect as it provides opportunities for employees to learn and discuss the reasons for the discrepancies with their supervisors.