Final answer:
The statement is false; creative voices from excluded groups often have a significant emotional impact and contribute to cultural discourse and social change. These expressions provide representation and challenge stereotypes, enriching cultural narratives and serving as catalysts for change.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'Creative voices from groups excluded from equal opportunity seldom have any emotional impact' is false. Creative voices, such as literature and artistic expressions from historically marginalized communities, often carry profound emotional impact and add invaluable perspectives and diversity to cultural discourse. For example, when fast food workers strike for higher wages, their actions highlight the struggles of minimum wage earners, influencing public opinion and policy.
In addition to providing rich cultural narratives, these voices can also challenge and change preexisting stereotypes and power dynamics. The work of authors, activists, and leaders from underrepresented groups often resonates deeply on an emotional level and can serve as a catalyst for social change, as seen in various historical and contemporary movements.
Furthermore, literature and other creative expressions are crucial for the representation of diverse experiences. Scholars like Woolf argue that exclusion from literary canons can be rectified by empowering voices from varied backgrounds. These perspectives are critical to developing a more inclusive society and contributing to the breadth of cultural expression.