Final answer:
Chester's self-concept changes depending on his social environment, reflecting a conservative persona with family and an outgoing one with friends. This highlights the fluidity and social influences on self-concept as addressed by humanistic theories and social psychologists like Carl Rogers, George Herbert Mead, and Charles Herbert Cooley.
Step-by-step explanation:
Chester's working self-concept is context-dependent when he finds himself around different people. When he is with his conservative family, he describes himself as conservative or reserved, but when he is with his friends from his tennis team, he describes himself as outgoing or spirited. This variability in self-description illustrates the malleable nature of self-concept, influenced significantly by the social environment and current interactions.
According to humanistic theorists like Carl Rogers, our self-concept is our internal answer to the question "Who am I?" and is made up of thoughts and feelings about ourselves. Rogers divided the self into two categories: the ideal self and the real self. He suggested that congruence between these two selves leads to higher self-worth and a more fulfilled life. This process is evident in the development of self-concept, which starts in childhood and is heavily influenced by various development stages and the social feedback individuals receive, such as in George Herbert Mead's concept of the generalized other and Charles Herbert Cooley's looking-glass self.