166k views
5 votes
3) Based on everything you have learned, which approach do you think is the - smarter approach? Why? What about it seems like a better idea? Is there anything about it you think needs to be changed? Your answer should be between one and three paragraphs in length.

the two different approaches are the treaty of Versailles kick em will there down


and Wilsons 14 points accommodating ​

1 Answer

2 votes

The smarter approach is President Woodrow Wilson's 14 Points, as it aimed to prevent future wars by addressing underlying causes of conflict. However, some aspects of Wilson's approach needed improvement and faced opposition from Congress.

In my opinion, the smarter approach is President Woodrow Wilson's 14 Points. Wilson's approach was based on the idea of preventing future wars by addressing the underlying causes of conflict. His 14 Points focused on principles such as self-determination, freedom of the seas, and the creation of a League of Nations to mediate international disputes. This approach seemed like a better idea because it aimed to create a more stable and peaceful world order.

However, there were some aspects of Wilson's approach that needed improvement. The treaty that emerged from the Versailles negotiations did not fully reflect all of Wilson's 14 Points.

For example, the treatment of Germany in the treaty was harsh and punitive, which ultimately contributed to resentment and the start of another conflict. Additionally, some members of Congress did not support Wilson's actions because they believed his approach sacrificed American sovereignty and independence.

User Josh Stevens
by
7.9k points