Final answer:
True, consent for sexual contact or exploitation given outside professional counseling sessions does not constitute a defense, due to the power dynamics and ethical considerations inherent in the professional relationship.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question relates to the complex issues surrounding consent, particularly within professional relationships where a power dynamic exists, such as between a therapist and a patient. The statement is true; consent given outside of professional counseling sessions or off the premises regularly used for professional counseling sessions does not absolve the professional of responsibility or negate the ethical breach. This is because the existing power differential and professional relationship can influence the individual's ability to consent freely, without coercion or manipulation.
For example, professional organizations such as the American Psychological Association have ethical guidelines that prohibit sexual relationships between therapists and clients due to the potential for exploitation and harm. Similarly, institutions like the College of William and Mary recognize the power difference between students and teachers, and consequentially prohibit all sexual contact to prevent exploitation and ensure professionalism.
It's significant to note that this extends beyond the physical location and formal session times; the ethical considerations apply to the professional relationship itself, regardless of setting. This is underscored by the recognition that sexual harassment or exploitation has impacts that go beyond the individuals involved, reflecting broader issues of systemic discrimination and the importance of maintaining trust in professional relationships.