Final answer:
Jordan, having a formal relationship with his boss and following established procedures, suggests that he is part of the out-group according to the leader-member exchange theory, which contrasts with the dynamic relationship of the in-group.
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the leader-member exchange theory, Jordan is likely part of the out-group. The leader-member exchange (LMX) theory revolves around the concept that leaders develop different kinds of relationships with different subordinates. Those in the in-group usually have a closer, more trusting relationship with their leader and often receive more opportunities for growth and empowerment. Conversely, members of the out-group tend to have a more formal relationship with the leader and engage in rigid adherence to established work procedures.
Jordan's situation indicates a formal relationship with his boss with a strong focus on following established procedures, which are characteristics typically associated with those in the out-group. The scenario doesn't provide evidence of a close, dynamic relationship with his leader or opportunities for personalized growth, which one would expect in the in-group. Additionally, the mature and partnership phases mentioned in the question refer to the stages of relationship quality in leader-member exchange theory. Jordan's scenario aligns with a static, rather than an evolving, relationship.