Final answer:
Slavery on the Indian Ocean network had similarities and differences compared to African slavery in the New World. The transatlantic slave trade was larger in scale and driven by Europeans, while the Indian Ocean trade involved a smaller number of slaves and a more diverse group of participants. The transatlantic slave trade was known for its brutal and dehumanizing treatment of slaves.
Step-by-step explanation:
Slavery on the Indian Ocean network had some similarities to African slavery in the New World but also some fundamental differences. In both cases, enslaved Africans were used for labor, particularly in agricultural activities. However, on the Indian Ocean network, enslaved people were often traded and transported over long distances, working in various regions like southern Iraq. The transatlantic slave trade, on the other hand, involved capturing Africans from their homelands and forcibly transporting them to the Americas.
One key distinction is that the transatlantic slave trade was much larger in scale and involved millions of enslaved Africans, while the Indian Ocean trade had a smaller number of slaves. Additionally, the transatlantic slave trade was driven by Europeans who sought to maximize profits through the mass exploitation of labor, while the Indian Ocean trade had a more diverse group of participants, including Europeans, Arabs, and Africans.
Overall, the conditions and experiences of enslaved people were harsh in both contexts, but the transatlantic slave trade was characterized by a more brutal and dehumanizing treatment of individuals, with an emphasis on extracting maximum labor from them.