Final answer:
Among the criticisms of sociobiology and evolutionary psychology, the statement that 'Early arguments were derived from evidence but provided no theoretical interpretation' is not a valid criticism, as it is part of the normal scientific process, unlike the lack of falsifiability or testability which are essential for empirical scrutiny.
Step-by-step explanation:
The subject of the question refers to sociobiology and evolutionary psychology, both of which study human behavior through the lens of genetics and natural selection. A valid criticism of these approaches is their potential lack of falsifiability or testability. Among the given options, the only statement which is not a criticism is 'Early arguments were derived from evidence but provided no theoretical interpretation'. This would not be a criticism, as deriving arguments from evidence is a fundamental component of scientific inquiry and providing theoretical interpretation is often subsequent to these findings. On the other hand, if ideas are not falsifiable or testable, they do not adhere to the scientific method's principles and consequently cannot be subjected to rigorous scientific evaluation or empirical observation, which are essential features of scientific explanations.