Final answer:
Teenager 1 could be charged with burglary and theft for sneaking into a neighbor's house and taking shoes and a firearm; charges may be more severe due to the theft of the gun. Legal rights and procedural standards, such as reasonable suspicion for stops and searches, are central to the justice system.
Step-by-step explanation:
If Teenager 1 sneaks into his neighbor's house to steal a $300 pair of Michael Jordan shoes and takes a .22 caliber derringer as well, he would likely be charged with burglary and theft. Burglary involves unlawful entry into a structure with the intent to commit a crime inside, and theft is the act of taking someone else's property without their permission with the intent to permanently deprive them of it. Because a firearm was involved, the theft of the gun could potentially elevate the charges, adding a firearms-specific charge such as theft of a firearm depending on the jurisdiction.
In the legal scenarios provided for reference, each describes a situation where individuals' rights and legal procedures are discussed in relation to the Fourth and Sixth Amendments, which protect citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures and guarantee the right to counsel, respectively. For instance, Terry v. Ohio establishes the right of police to stop and frisk a suspect for weapons based on reasonable suspicion. This is applicable if Teenager 1 was stopped and found with the stolen items.
Considering the scenarios given, it is crucial to understand how legal rights and the presumption of innocence factor into the justice system. Even when police suspect someone of a more severe crime, without direct evidence, they must still adhere to legal standards of evidence and procedure.