Question

Read the passage below and answer the following question.

As a parent, I find television and movie rating systems unhelpful. Ratings systems are not human. Their scores are based on numbers: how many bad words, how many gory scenes. To me, that makes no sense. Nobody else knows my kids like I do, so nobody else can say what's okay for them to watch.

In my experience, the content a government organization rates as PG or PG-13 may or may not be appropriate for my 9-, 14-, and 16-year-olds. My youngest is quite mature for his age, and I'm fine with him hearing a bad word or two as a part of a meaningful story.

Violence concerns me more. I won't let even my 16-year-old watch frivolous violence or horror. But I don't shelter him from realistic violence. My little guy still has to stay out of the room for the bloody stuff. But eventually, kids need to know what's out there.

The primary purpose of this passage is to:

a. decide
b. inform
c. persuade
d. entertain

Answer 1

The passage's primary purpose is to persuade readers that movie rating systems are insufficient and that parents should use personal judgement to decide what their children watch, tailored to each child's maturity.

Step-by-step explanation:

The primary purpose of the passage is to persuade. The parent expresses dissatisfaction with the movie rating systems, explaining that such systems lack the nuances to understand individual children. Instead of relying on ratings alone, the parent advocates for personal judgement to determine the suitability of content for their children, arguing that direct experience and knowledge of one's children are essential for making informed decisions about media consumption. This persuasive argument outlines a subjective view on the effectiveness of media ratings and suggests that one-size-fits-all approaches do not account for individual maturity and sensitivity levels among different children.