Question

Evaluating a decision in the context of fundamental rights for all people is an example of

a.) Utilitarian Approach
b.) Kantianism Approach
c.) Distributive Justice Approach
d.) Procedural Justice approach

Answer 1

Evaluating a decision based on fundamental rights aligns with the Kantianism Approach, focusing on rights and duties rather than outcomes.

Step-by-step explanation:

Evaluating a decision in the context of fundamental rights for all people is an example of a Kantianism Approach. Kantianism, also known as deontological ethics, asserts that actions are morally right based on whether they adhere to categorical imperatives, which are principles that any rational being would recognize as necessary. This approach is focused on the intrinsic value of actions and the rights and duties associated with them, rather than the outcomes or consequences. Immanuel Kant believed that these fundamental moral rules are universally applicable and must be followed regardless of the consequences. Therefore, when evaluating a decision based on the recognition and respect for fundamental rights, one is typically applying the Kantianism Approach, honoring the notion that all individuals should be treated as ends in themselves, not merely as means to an end.