Final answer:
When choosing an investigator, one must consider any potential conflicts of interest, the professionalism and attitude of the investigator, and how they pose questions to remain neutral and unbiased. Verification of the investigator's expertise and consensus among experts, as well as exploring potential biases and motives, are also crucial for ensuring credible results.
Step-by-step explanation:
When choosing an investigator, it is vital to be wary of certain potential issues. Primarily, one must consider any conflicts of interest the investigator may have that could impair objective judgment. Additionally, the attitude of the investigator and their ability to maintain professionalism and objectivity are crucial. Moreover, how the investigator asks questions is important; ensuring they do so neutrally without leading respondents towards a particular answer is a marker of their expertise and impartiality.
It's also important to assess the expertise of an investigator. Confirming whether the person supplying the testimony is an expert in the relevant field and if there is a consensus among these experts on the question at hand are essential for credibility. The testimony should reflect agreement with the consensus of experts, or if it differs, provide valid, logical reasons for why this is the case.
Investigation into any potential biases the investigator may have is critical. The possibilities of misconceived perceptions or ulterior motives can significantly impact the reliability of the investigator's findings. Thorough research into the investigator's background, track record, and possible motives can thus provide insight into their propensity for bias or distortion.
The credibility of an investigator is fundamental to the integrity of their findings. As such, diligence in researching the author and understanding where their information originates, their professional standing, and analyzing multiple sources to detect any omissions or biases is imperative.