Final answer:
Unacceptable IDs for verifying age include non-photo, non-government or expired IDs, and some student IDs, which can disproportionately affect young adults, Hispanics, and low-income individuals.
Step-by-step explanation:
Unacceptable IDs for verifying a customer's age typically encompass those that do not have a photo, are not government-issued, or do not have a current validity. For instance, in Indiana, per the 2005 photo identification law, valid photo IDs must show the individual's name matching voter registration records, display an expiration date, be current or have expired only since the last general election, and be issued by the state of Indiana or the U.S. government. Acceptable forms of ID include driver's licenses and state-issued identification cards, while student identification cards are accepted if they meet certain standards. Opponents of strict photo ID laws point out that such requirements can disproportionately affect young adults, particularly those aged 18-24, Hispanics, and individuals without a college education, as they may be less likely to possess the necessary identification. This can impact their ability to vote and perform other age-verified tasks.
Examples of unacceptable IDs would include non-government-issued membership cards, expired IDs, out-of-date student IDs, or any other form of identification lacking a photo or not matching legal documentation. The exclusion of certain IDs, especially from those earning less than $25,000 a year, can raise concerns regarding equal access to voting and other services where age verification is required.