Final answer:
Andrew Jackson's veto of the recharter for the Bank of the US was not intended to win over wealthy voters; instead, it was a stand against what he considered a monopoly that was unconstitutional and harmful to the nation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The option NOT among Andrew Jackson's reasons for vetoing the bill to recharter the Bank of the US in 1832 is e. He wanted to win over wealthy voters from the North and East in his reelection campaign. Jackson's objections to the bank were based on his belief that it represented a monopoly that had too much control over the nation's economy (b), was unconstitutional (c), and was potentially harmful to the nation (d). His personal dislike of the bank's director, Nicholas Biddle, and his distrust of banks, in general, influenced his stance. The real intent behind Jackson's veto was to appeal to common Americans and maintain his image as a champion of the everyday man against Eastern elites. He sought to dismantle the power of the bank, which he saw as an institution that favored a privileged few at the expense of the majority.