4.2k views
5 votes
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were ineffective in securing the rights outlined by the Fourteenth Amendment​.

A.True
B. False

User Klarth
by
7.0k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were not ineffective in securing the rights outlined by the Fourteenth Amendment.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were ineffective in securing the rights outlined by the Fourteenth Amendment is False.

The Fourteenth Amendment, which was ratified in 1868, guarantees equal protection under the law and prohibits discrimination based on race. The Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act were both enacted to enforce the rights protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. The Voting Rights Act, in particular, played a crucial role in securing voting rights for racial minorities.

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was highly effective in eliminating discriminatory voting practices, such as literacy tests and poll taxes, that had previously prevented African Americans from exercising their right to vote. It provided federal oversight and protection to ensure that racial minorities could freely participate in the electoral process. The act is widely regarded as one of the most impactful pieces of civil rights legislation in U.S. history.

User Downatone
by
7.0k points