Final answer:
Venice's opportunity cost of producing one pound of pasta is 2.5 bottles of wine. Florence's opportunity cost of producing one pound of pasta is 0.5 bottle of wine. Venice's opportunity cost of producing one bottle of wine is 0.4 pound of pasta. Florence's opportunity cost of producing one bottle of wine is 2 pounds of pasta. Florence has the comparative advantage in producing pasta, while Venice has the comparative advantage in producing wine.
Step-by-step explanation:
a. The opportunity cost of producing one pound of pasta in Venice is 2.5 bottles of wine. This means that for every pound of pasta produced, Venice has to give up producing 2.5 bottles of wine.
b. The opportunity cost of producing one bottle of wine in Venice is 0.4 pound of pasta. This means that for every bottle of wine produced, Venice has to give up producing 0.4 pound of pasta.
c. The opportunity cost of producing one pound of pasta in Florence is 0.5 bottle of wine. This means that for every pound of pasta produced, Florence has to give up producing 0.5 bottle of wine.
d. The opportunity cost of producing one bottle of wine in Florence is 2 pounds of pasta. This means that for every bottle of wine produced, Florence has to give up producing 2 pounds of pasta.
e. Florence has the comparative advantage in producing pasta, while Venice has the comparative advantage in producing wine.