Final answer:
Moderate Sarte represents a philosophical stance that seeks a balance between absolute freedom and structured societal influences, while acknowledging the role of institutions in shaping ethical behavior and promoting personal autonomy within a framework of social stability.
Step-by-step explanation:
When adapting objections towards Extreme Sarte, and looking at the viewpoint of Moderate Sarte, we're likely referring to a philosophical perspective that seeks a middle ground between absolute freedom and predetermined structures. Moderate Sarte might agree with critiques of extreme existentialism that suggest without some structure or guidance, human beings might tend towards irrational or destructive behaviors as highlighted by conservative figures such as Joseph de Maistre. In contrast to the extreme view that humans have utter freedom to create values, Moderate Sarte might acknowledge that societal institutions like government and education can play a positive role in shaping ethical human behavior. For example, while advocating for personal autonomy rights, a moderate perspective might also stress the importance of character education in schools, linking this claim to the philosophical tradition that dates back to Aristotle. This approach offers a blend of personal autonomy with a respect for the stabilizing forces of society.
The strengths of such an approach include a more balanced perspective that avoids the pitfalls of both extreme libertinism and authoritarian control. However, the limitations might involve the potential for ambiguity in determining the right balance between freedom and structure, potentially leading to conflicting interpretations of Moderate Sarte's ideal society.