Final answer:
The question seems to mix the context of annuities with U.S. voting legislation, but the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is crucial for understanding voting rights protections for minorities. The Shelby County v. Holder decision in 2013 altered the VRA's enforcement, leading to state-level changes in voter ID laws.
Step-by-step explanation:
The voting rights of a variable annuity contract holder are generally shown in the contract's prospectus or policy documentation. However, the question may be referring to the broader context of voting rights in the United States, which can be understood through historical legislation such as the Voting Rights Act (VRA) of 1965. This act had a substantial impact on protecting the voting rights of minorities by preventing states from enacting laws that denied voting rights on the basis of race.
The VRA also authorized the attorney general to send federal examiners to oversee registration and elections in areas with historical discrimination. Yet, the Shelby County v. Holder decision in 2013 by the Supreme Court changed the enforcement of the VRA, moving much of the decision-making on election policy to state and local jurisdictions. Following this decision, several states introduced changes to their voter ID laws.