Final answer:
Donald's perspective is an example of gender discrimination, contradicting efforts to value the dignity of labor for women both at home and in the workforce. It also goes against the push for equality and the right for women to choose their own career paths.
Step-by-step explanation:
Donald's attitudes and planned course of action are indicative of gender discrimination. The mindset that women should not work outside the home and the intention never to hire a woman in his bank demonstrate a disregard for the capabilities and freedoms of women in the professional sphere. Despite the efforts of activists in the past to show that employment for women is natural and necessary, and the reality that many women have to work out of necessity, there are still individuals like Donald who hold to these outdated and discriminatory beliefs. To combat such ideas, it was essential to affirm the dignity of labor both inside and outside the home, striving for equality and the rights of all workers. While some have critiqued the portrayal of stay-at-home mothers, believing that recognizing women's work only in the public sphere might devalue domestic labor, the overarching goal of many was to ensure that women had the freedom to choose their path, whether that be at home or in the workforce.