Final answer:
Artistic divisions can lead to an unequal distribution of cultural capital due to historical valuation that privileges some art forms over others and internal cultural stratification as outlined by Pierre Bourdieu, which results in a social class reproduction favoring those with more cultural capital.
Step-by-step explanation:
The two factors that explain why artistic divisions can lead to an unequal distribution of cultural capital are related to historical valuation and the internal stratification of a culture. Firstly, many distinctions in art and culture have been historically determined by Eurocentric art historians placing higher value on certain forms of art over others. This often occurs due to who is producing the work rather than skill or aesthetic qualities, causing some forms of artistic production like basketry or textiles to be labeled as 'craft' rather than 'fine art.'
Secondly, according to sociologist Pierre Bourdieu's theory on cultural capital, there is a stratification within cultures based on material goods, non-material attitudes, and knowledge specific to certain economic classes. This leads to social class reproduction, with the upper and middle classes possessing more cultural capital which grants them more opportunities and experiences, further widening the gap between different social strata.
These divisions are reinforced by the educational system, where instruction and tests cater to the dominant culture's values, and this is also evident in other areas such as access to technology, leading to a digital divide and technological stratification. Such a divide not only separates those with access to technology from those without but also creates a knowledge gap that can affect a person's marketability in the job market.