Final answer:
Reduced benefit cost is not a benefit of job rotation; the practice is aimed at employee engagement, staffing flexibility, and developing a multiskilled workforce, but does not directly lead to savings on employee benefit costs.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks what is not a benefit of job rotation, and the options provided are related to employee engagement, employer staffing flexibility, development of a multiskilled workforce, and reduced benefit cost. Reduced benefit cost is not typically a benefit of job rotation.
Job rotation refers to the practice of moving employees through a variety of jobs, roles, or tasks at a company over time. This process is meant to empower the workforce, provide variety in work, and create a more flexible and skilled set of employees.
While job rotation certainly fosters engagement in work for the employee by reducing monotony and burnout, and flexibility for employer staffing needs by creating a group of workers who can perform a variety of roles, as well as creating a multiskilled workforce, it does not inherently lead to reduced benefits cost.
In fact, job rotation might initially increase training costs as employees learn varied roles. Moreover, it does not directly affect the company's cost structure regarding employee benefits, which typically includes healthcare, retirement benefits, and other employee perks.