Final answer:
Yes, facilitating each party to fully present their case during a meeting contributes to a constructive resolution, ensuring all perspectives are considered. Active listening and problem-solving tactics are essential for maintaining a productive environment, while acknowledging the limitations of majority voting in multi-option scenarios. so, option a is the correct answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
When chairing a meeting where two participants are in disagreement, it can indeed be constructive to have them each make a complete case while the rest of the group pays attention. Dealing with conflicts thoroughly can lead to a decision that is more closely tailored to the preferences of the group members, offering a chance for all voices to be heard and respected, which can contribute to a more harmonious resolution. However, along with this, it is crucial to ensure that the discussion remains respectful. Practicing active listening, asking open-ended questions, and focusing on problem-solving rather than blaming can help keep the situation calm and productive. It is also important to note that while majority rule is typically seen as the fair way to make decisions, it can fail to produce a single preferred outcome when there are more than two choices, as preferences can cycle without reaching a consensus.
In a meeting where two participants are in disagreement, it is generally best to encourage each participant to make a complete case while the group members give their full attention. This allows for all perspectives to be heard and understood before a decision is made. By actively listening and considering each person's point of view, the group can work towards resolving the conflict and finding a solution that satisfies everyone to some extent.