Final answer:
Teams are more effective when they collaborate, not compete. Majority rule may fail with more than two choices due to vote splitting. The team halo effect makes teams seem more effective than they may actually be.
Step-by-step explanation:
Effectiveness of Team Dynamics
Teams are most effective when individual members collaborate rather than compete with one another. Healthy competition can be motivating, but excessive competition can lead to conflict and reduced team effectiveness. For teams to reach their highest potential, collaboration, communication, and a shared goal are vital components. Therefore, the statement "Teams are most effective when individual members are able to compete with one another" is false.
Majority Rule Limitations
True or false: Majority rule can fail to produce a single preferred outcome when there are more than two choices. This statement is true. When multiple options are available, vote splitting can occur, which may result in no single choice receiving a majority of votes. This phenomenon, known as Condorcet's paradox, demonstrates the limitation of the majority rule in elections or decision-making processes involving more than two options.
Team Halo Effect
One effect of the team halo effect is that teams appear to work better than they actually do. The team halo effect can lead to the overestimation of a team's performance or abilities simply because they are a team, rather than based on their actual outcomes or productivity.