Final answer:
Social networks vary across different ethnic groups, with collectivistic cultures emphasizing familial and communal relationships, while some ethnic groups treat friends as family members, reflecting the closeness of their social relationships. In contrast, White majorities may have more individualistic networks with less perception of ethnicity influencing their social integration.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question investigates the content loaded Differences in social networks: ethnicity. Observations indicate that individuals from different ethnic backgrounds maintain varied relationship patterns within their social networks. For example, people from collectivistic cultures, which include many Asian cultures, often have warmer relationships with siblings and a greater focus on community and familial ties, as opposed to individual achievements. They partake in group activities like preparing meals and spending time together, reflecting a collectivistic value system.
In contrast, other ethnic groups have been noted to designate friends as family members, implying that their friends are treated almost as kin. This behavior may be seen in diverse ethnic communities and is indicative of the strength and closeness of their social relationships. Meanwhile, compared to ethnic minorities, White majorities in Western countries may have more individualistic networks and may not perceive their ethnicity to influence their social integration as profoundly. Nevertheless, for ethnic minorities, there is a heightened sense of racial and cultural identity that can significantly influence their social experiences and relationships.Other benefits, such as mutual support—whether economic, political, or recreational—are more easily attained when members of the same ethnic group live in proximity. This clustering can reduce certain types of conflict since shared values and traditions contribute to greater cultural cohesion within the neighborhood.