Final answer:
Many people find it more morally repulsive to kill someone by thrusting a knife into their body compared to shooting them with a gun from a distance. This is best explained by Haidt's intuitionist perspective, which suggests that moral judgments are primarily driven by intuitive and emotional responses.
Step-by-step explanation:
The best explanation for why many people find it more morally repulsive to kill someone by thrusting a knife into their body compared to shooting them with a gun from a distance is found in Haidt's intuitionist perspective. According to Haidt, moral judgments are primarily driven by intuitive and emotional responses rather than rational reasoning.
When someone thrusts a knife into another person's body, it involves close physical contact and is a highly personal and intimate act. This physical proximity intensifies the emotional impact and makes it more morally repulsive for many people.
In contrast, shooting someone with a gun from a distance creates a greater psychological and emotional distance between the perpetrator and the victim. This distance can diminish the emotional impact and make it less morally repulsive for some people.