5.8k views
1 vote
After teaching the mother of a 2-month-old with a congenital heart defect complicated by heart failure about nutrition, which statement by the mother indicates a need for further teaching?

A) ""The baby may need up to 150 calories/kg per day.""
B) ""Small frequent feeds are best if tolerated.""
C) ""The baby will need to drink formula, not breast milk.""
D) ""Gavage feedings may be required for now.""

1 Answer

7 votes

Final answer:

The incorrect statement made by the mother is that the baby requires formula instead of breast milk. This is inaccurate as breast milk is usually recommended for its health benefits, even for babies with heart defects, unless specified otherwise by a healthcare professional.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement by the mother that indicates a need for further teaching is C) "The baby will need to drink formula, not breast milk." This is incorrect because both breast milk and formula are suitable for a baby with a congenital heart defect, provided they meet the nutritional requirements of the infant. Breast milk is typically recommended for its various health benefits unless a specific formula is needed due to certain conditions or nutritional needs.

Babies with congenital heart defects complicated by heart failure may have increased energy requirements, often needing up to 150 calories/kg per day. Small frequent feeds can be easier for these babies to handle, and gavage feeding might be necessary if the baby is not able to take enough nutrition by mouth. However, breast milk can still be used for gavage feeding and contains vital nutrients and antibodies beneficial for the baby's health and development.

User Shawneen
by
7.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.