230k views
3 votes
Nodosaurids were not heavily armored as ankylosaurids.
A. True
B. False

User TriTap
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

The claim that nodosaurids were not as heavily armored as ankylosaurids is false. Both families boasted significant armor, including bony plates and, for ankylosaurids, a tail club.

Step-by-step explanation:

The statement is false; nodosaurids were indeed heavily armored, similar to ankylosaurids. They were both part of the Ornithischia group of dinosaurs, known for having a pelvis similar to that of birds, despite birds actually evolving from the 'lizard-hipped' saurischian lineage. Both nodosaurids and ankylosaurids evolved protective features; nodosaurids were known for their rows of bony plates called osteoderms that covered their backs, while ankylosaurids also had bony plates, but with the addition of a bony club at the end of their tails.

Herrerasaurus is an example of a bipedal dinosaur that walked upright, a trait distinct from the quadrupedal stance of the heavily armored herbivores like ankylosaurs and nodosaurs. The Ornithischia group exhibited a range of diverse body shapes, from armored tanks like ankylosaurs to those with elaborate crests like Parasaurolophus, showing the wide spectrum of evolutionary adaptations among herbivorous dinosaurs.

User Nick Forge
by
7.3k points