Robert Bork, nominated for the U.S. Supreme Court in 1987, faced opposition for his originalist and strict constructionist philosophy. The term "borked" emerged from his contentious confirmation process, highlighting the scrutiny and rejection of a nominee.
Robert Bork, a distinguished legal scholar and judge, was nominated by President Ronald Reagan for the United States Supreme Court in 1987. Bork's judicial philosophy was rooted in originalism and strict constructionism.
He believed in interpreting the Constitution according to the framers' original intent, advocating for a restrained judiciary that adhered closely to the text of the Constitution.
Bork's views faced strong opposition during his Senate confirmation hearings, primarily due to concerns about his stance on civil rights and privacy issues. Critics feared that his strict interpretation of the Constitution might undermine established rights, including those recognized in landmark cases like Roe v. Wade.
The contentious confirmation process led to the coining of the term "borked" in political discourse, signifying the intense scrutiny and rejection of a nominee. While the term is associated with political attacks, it's essential to note that critiques of Bork's judicial philosophy were central to the controversy surrounding his nomination.
Complete question:
Have you ever been "borked"? unless you're a political nominee whose nomination got cut short because people attacked your reputation with strong criticism, probably not. but here's someone who has been: robert bork. he got "borked" so bad that his own name is where the word came from. of course, not everyone agrees that a public attack was bork's only problem. Based on what you learned earlier in this lesson, how would you describe Bork's judicial philosophy? (If you can't tell from the article you already found, find another source.