Final answer:
The best description of the two parts is Hobbes's argument followed by Story's argument, as the first part appears to align with Hobbes's views, and the second part connects to Story's interpretations of constitutional law.
Step-by-step explanation:
The two distinct parts of the excerpt can best be described as B. Hobbes's argument, followed by Story's argument. The first part hints at the procedural flow of a trial with the attorneys for prosecution and defense presenting their arguments, witnesses testifying, and cross-examinations occurring. This part potentially reflects Hobbes's view of social contract and governance. The second part discusses a Supreme Court case, possibly referring to Story's commentaries on constitutional law, by highlighting the case's impact on the interpretation and application of constitutional rights. While this question may involve close reading and interpretation to identify which historical figures or legal authorities are being referenced, the excerpt involving court procedure and rulings suggests involvement of key legal authorities like Hobbes and Story.