Final answer:
An aggressive communication style from a supervisor would likely demotivate employees and create a hostile work environment, whereas an assertive style facilitates a healthy, collaborative relationship. Maintaining professionalism and engaging in bridge-building conversations post-conflict can improve mutual understanding. Supportive leadership styles are crucial for employee motivation and productivity.
Step-by-step explanation:
If my supervisor used an aggressive rather than assertive communication style to motivate me to be more productive, my reaction would likely involve feeling demotivated and disrespected. This approach can create a hostile work environment, leading to work overload, lack of perceived control, and ultimately, reduced productivity. In contrast, an assertive communication style is more conducive to a healthy and collaborative working relationship, as it respects an employee's autonomy while conveying expectations clearly.
Understanding the supervisor's work style is crucial for addressing such issues. For instance, if my manager's approach is generally bureaucratic or overwhelming, this might be reflected in their communication style. To effectively approach my work and communication with my manager, I would aim to maintain professionalism and attempt to foster a bridge-building conversation following any conflict. This could repair the relationship and lead to greater mutual understanding, enabling us to work towards a mode of communication that inspires rather than discourages productivity.
Based on the studies cited, human interaction factors like a supportive supervisorial style have a significant impact on employee motivation and productivity, highlighting the importance of leadership styles that foster positive work environments and employee well-being.